An empirical analysis of bilateral trade relations between Kazakhstan and China
Ключевые слова:
Bilateral trade, intra-industry trade, trade reciprocity, trade intensityАннотация
The aim of this research study is to investigate the bilateral trade relations between Kazakhstan and China and tries to answer the questions whether trade between Kazakhstan and China is balanced, whether the trade composition has been changed over period, and to gauge the Kazakhstan’s position in China’s markets and vice versa. For this purpose, this study employed trade indices such as intra-industry trade indices, trade reciprocity, and trade intensity index over the period 1995-2014. The intra-industry trade results indicate that trade composition has been changed over the years and now intra-industry trade is high in non-manufactured products than at the start of the period. Furthermore, results of the study confirm that trade between Kazakhstan and China has been increased however, it is not balanced. Besides this study finds that Kazakhstan lost its market position in China while the extent of China’s exports position has been strengthened during the study period. There is potential to balance the bilateral trade and both governments have to minimize the obstacles to bilateral trade.
Библиографические ссылки
Aquino, A. (1978). Intra-industry trade and inter-industry specialization as concurrent sources of
international trade in manufactures, WeltwirtschaftlichesArchiv, 114(2), 275-296.
Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalisation and revealed comparative advantage, The Manchester School of
Economics and Social Studies, 33(2),99-123.
Bano, S. (2014). Trade relations between New Zealand and China: An empirical Analysis in the context of
a free trade agreement, Review of Economics and Finance, 4, 75-92.
Brown, A. J. (1947).Applied Economics: Aspects of the World Economy in War and Peace,
London,George Allen and Urwin.
Dodonov V. (2010). Kazakhstan and China: Trade and Economic Cooperation, China and Eurasia Forum
Quarterly, 8(4), 11-15.
Duan, X. and Wang, X. (2016). A Study of Trade Structure of Industrial Products in Both China and
Kazakhstan—Based one Road Economic Belt, Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics, 3, 64-71.
Eaton, J. and Kierzkowski H. (1984).Oligopolistic Competition, Product Variety and International Trade,
Oxford, Kierzkowski.
Grubel, H.G. and Lloyd, P. J. (1975).Intra Industry Trade,London, Macmillan.
Helpman, E. and Krugman P. (1985).Market Structure and Foreign Trade,Brighton, Harvester
Wheatsheaf.
Hu, G. (2014). An Analysis of Trade Competitiveness and Structural Changes between China and
Kazakhstan, Xinjiang University of Finance and Economics,6, 58-67.
Ibraimov, S. (2009). China-Central Asia Trade Relations: Economic and Social Patterns, China and
Eurasia Forum Quarterly, 7(1), 47-59.
Johnson, D. and Turner, C. (2009).International Business: Themes and Issues in the Modern Global
Economy,London,Taylor and Francis.
Kojima, K. (1964). The pattern of international trade among advanced countries, Hitotsuboshi Journal of
Economics, 5(1), 16-36.
Lloyd, P.J. and Grubel, H.G. (2003).Intra-Industry Trade, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Raballand, G. and Andresy, A. (2007). Why Should Trade between Central Asia and China Continue to
Expand?,Asia-Europe Journal, 5(2), 235-252.
Tharakan, K.P.M. (1981). The economics of intra-industry trade: A survey, Louvain Economic Review,
(3/4), 259-290
Verdoorn, P.J. (1960).The Intra-Block Trade of Benelux,London,Macmillan.
Wadhva, C.D. and Asher, M.G. (1985).ASEAN-South Asia economic relations,Singapore, Institute of
Southeast Asian Studies.
Wang W.R. (2009). Empirical Study of Kazakhstan's Foreign Trade Based on Trade Gravity
Model,Russian Studies,156(2), 91-98.
www.comtrade.un.org: United Nations Trade statistics Data Base.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Как цитировать
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2022 Архив научных исследований
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование — Без производных произведений») 4.0 Всемирная.